1
Questions and Answers / Re: Scugog
« on: March 14, 2007, 10:32:08 PM »
Results of the tenders on the waterfront lot: Highest bid: 182,429; 2nd highest: 152,000. Number of bids: 29!
I guess people weren't scared off by the threats of litigation. Interestingly, I understand that both the highest and second highest bids were from locals. One of the real estate agents I spoke to on Monday was there and submitted the second highest bid. She suggested that the FMV on the property was closer to 250,000. Fascinating process. I'm glad I bid even though I wasn't even close.
Another interesting aside. I spoke with a couple of guys who were there to bid on the 143 acre property. It was withdrawn about an hour before the auction so they didn't get a chance to submit their bid but apparently the 700k+ crown lien and the Greenbelt restrictions didn't scare them off (because they were "farmers" from "Pickering" and only intended to use the land for agricultural purposes). Comments?
I guess people weren't scared off by the threats of litigation. Interestingly, I understand that both the highest and second highest bids were from locals. One of the real estate agents I spoke to on Monday was there and submitted the second highest bid. She suggested that the FMV on the property was closer to 250,000. Fascinating process. I'm glad I bid even though I wasn't even close.
Another interesting aside. I spoke with a couple of guys who were there to bid on the 143 acre property. It was withdrawn about an hour before the auction so they didn't get a chance to submit their bid but apparently the 700k+ crown lien and the Greenbelt restrictions didn't scare them off (because they were "farmers" from "Pickering" and only intended to use the land for agricultural purposes). Comments?